石油化工设计 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 30-34.doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1005-8168.2020.02.008

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

JCT与FIDIC设计-建造合同条件中支付管理的比较分析

王明皓   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-09 接受日期:2019-10-09 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 王明皓,wangminghao@sei.com.cn E-mail:wangminghao@sei.com.cn
  • 作者简介:王明皓,男,2014年毕业于天津大学工程管理专业,管理学硕士,经济师,主要从事控制工作。联系电话:010-84877740;E-mail: wangminghao@sei.com.cn

Comparison of Payment Management between JCT Design-Build Contract and FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build

Wang Minghao   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing, 100101
  • Received:2019-10-09 Accepted:2019-10-09 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-05-25
  • Contact: Wang Minghao,wangminghao@sei.com.cn E-mail:wangminghao@sei.com.cn

摘要: 支付问题是项目管理的核心问题之一,影响到项目的费用、工期、现金流等多个方面的正常运转。作为目前被广泛使用的合同条款、JCT条款和FIDIC条款对于支付问题都有详细的规定。然而,在2016-2017年JCT和FIDIC条款相继更新后,目前学界对于这2 个新版合同条款的研究及其对比分析却较少。选取了设计—建造(Design-Build)合同模式,针对其支付问题,以这2个合同范本作该合同实例进行对比分析

关键词: JCT条款, FIDIC条款, 设计—建造合同, 支付管理

Abstract: Payment issue is one of the core issues of project management, which affects project cost, schedule, cash flow and other aspects. As the widely used contract terms, JCT terms and FIDIC terms have detailed provisions on payment management. However, after the JCT and FIDIC terms were updated successively in 2016 and 2017, there are few studies and comparative analysis on the two new versions. Aiming at the payment issues, this paper selects the Design-Build contract mode to perform comparative analysis based on these two contract terms.

Key words: JCT clause, FIDIC clause, design-build contract, payment management